First published on June 29, 2010
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, doi:10.1001/dmp.2010.6
© 2010 American Medical Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cross, W.
Right arrow Articles by Herrmann, J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cross, W.
Right arrow Articles by Herrmann, J.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Predicting Dissemination of a Disaster Mental Health "Train-the-Trainer" Program

Wendi Cross 1*, Catherine Cerulli 1, Heidi Richards 1, Hua He 1, Jack Herrmann 1

1 Dr Cross is associate professor, Dr Cerulli is associate professor, and Ms Richards is a research assistant in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC); Dr He is assistant professor of biostatistics, URMC. Mr Herrmann is senior advisor for public health preparedness at the National Association of County and City Health Officials, Washington, DC, and was an assistant professor at URMC at the time of the study.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Wendi_Cross{at}URMC.Rochester.edu.


arrow
Abstract

Objective: Disaster mental health (DMH) is vital to comprehensive disaster preparedness for communities. A train-the-trainer (TTT) model is frequently used in public health to disseminate knowledge and skills to communities, although few studies have examined its success. We report on the development and implementation of a DMH TTT program and examine variables that predict dissemination.

Methods: This secondary analysis examines 140 community-based mental health providers’ participation in a TTT DMH program in 2005–2006. Instructors’ dissemination of the training was followed for 12 months. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to predict dissemination of the training program.

Results: Sixty percent of the trainees in the DMH TTT program conducted training programs in the 12-month period following being trained. The likelihood of conducting training programs was predicted by a self-report measure of perceptions of transfer of training. The number of individuals subsequently trained (559) was predicted by prior DMH training and sex. No other variables predicted dissemination of DMH training.

Conclusions: The TTT model was moderately successful in disseminating DMH training. Intervention at the organizational and individual level, as well as training modifications, may increase cost-effective dissemination of DMH training.