First published on July 6, 2010
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, doi:10.1001/dmphp.D-09-00059R1
© 2010 American Medical Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Pepe, P. E.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Pepe, P. E.

CONCEPTS IN DISASTER MEDICINE

Attributes of Effective Disaster Responders: Focus Group Discussions With Key Emergency Response Leaders

Richard V. King 1*, Carol S. North 1, Gregory L. Larkin 1, Dana L. Downs 1, Kelly R. Klein 1, Raymond L. Fowler 1, Raymond E. Swienton 1, Paul E. Pepe 1

1 Drs King, North, Fowler, Swienton, and Pepe and Mr Downs are with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dr Larkin is with Yale University; and Dr Klein is with Maimonides Medical Center.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: richard.king{at}utsouthwestern.edu.


arrow
Abstract

Methods: An effective disaster response requires competent responders and leaders. The purpose of this study was to ask experts to identify attributes that distinguish effective from ineffective responders and leaders in a disaster. In this qualitative study, focus groups were held with jurisdictional medical directors for the 9-1-1 emergency medical services systems of the majority of the nation's largest cities. These sessions were recorded with audio equipment and later transcribed.

Results: The researchers identified themes within the transcriptions, created categories, and coded passages into these categories. Overall interrater reliability was excellent ({kappa} = .8). The focus group transcripts yielded 138 codable passages. Ten categories were developed from analysis of the content: Incident Command System/Disaster Training/Experience, General Training/Experience, Teamwork/Interpersonal, Communication, Cognition, Problem Solving/Decision Making, Adaptable/Flexible, Calm/Cool, Character, and Performs Role. The contents of these categories included knowledge, skills, attitudes, behaviors, and personal characteristics.

Conclusions: Experts in focus groups identified a variety of competencies for disaster responders and leaders. These competencies will require validation through further research that involves input from the disaster response community at large.

Key Words: competency-based education, disaster medicine, public health/emergency preparedness, health personnel education/training, consensus